Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Lay People’s Views on the Appropriateness of Psychotherapies

Etienne Mullet, Maria Teresa Munoz Sastre, Florence Sordes-Ader

Abstract


Rationale, aims and objectives When choosing a particular psychotherapy, psychotherapists are expected to take into account their clients’ preferences, needs, and values, their own professional experience, and what is currently known regarding the real impact of these therapies. Psychotherapists widely vary the one from the other in the weight they attribute to each of these factors. We examined the way lay people judge of the appropriateness of therapeutic decisions taken by clinical psychologists.

Methods 206 participants were presented with 24 vignettes depicting the way a psychotherapist has selected therapy. They were composed according to a three within-subject factor design: (a) the frequency with which the therapy was used in clinical practice in the area, (b) the patients’ usual level of appreciation of this therapy, and (c) the level of scientific evidence supporting the use of this therapy (strong evidence, weak evidence, unknown evidence and no evidence). The participants rated appropriateness of the decision in each case.

Results For half the participants, the most important factor was the patients’ appreciation of the therapy in general. Even scientifically supported therapies were considered as only mildly appropriate if patients in general didn’t like them much. For the remaining half of participants, scientific evidence was the most important factor: Therapies that were well appreciated by patients were not viewed as appropriate if they were not scientifically grounded.

Conclusions Creating authoritative multilingual web sites synthesizing the main findings regarding the impact of diverse therapies would be a way through which at least some patients could judge of the appropriateness of the technique they have been offered by their psychotherapists. Their (informed) reactions could ease changes in direction of more weight attributed to existing scientific evidence from the part of therapists. 


Keywords


Clinical decision- making, evidence-based practices, lay people’s views, person-centered healthcare, psychotherapy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kazdin, A. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice. New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist 63, 146-159.

Addis, M.E. & Krasnow, A.D. (2000). A national survey of practicing psychologists’ attitudes towards psychotherapy treatment manuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 68, 331-339.

Kazdin, A. (2011). Evidence-based treatment research: Advances, limitations, and next steps. American Psychologist 66, 685-698.

Sharp, I.R., Herbert, J.D. & Redding, R. (2008). The role of critical thinking in practicing psychologists’ theoretical orientation and choice of intervention techniques. The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice 6, 21-30.

Aarons, G.A., Glisson, C., Hoagwood, K., Kelleher, K., Landsverk, J., Cafri, G. & the Research Network on Youth Mental Health. (2010). Psychometric properties and U.S. national norms of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS). Psychological Assessment 22, 356-365.

Gaudiano, B.A., Brown, L.A. & Miller, I.W. (2011). Let your intuition be your guide? Individual differences in the evidence-based practice attitudes of psychotherapists. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17, 628-634.

Kazdin, A.E., Siegel, T.C. & Bass, D. (1990). Drawing on clinical practice to inform research on child and adolescent psychotherapy: Survey of paractitioners. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 21, 189-198.

Ashcraft, R.G.P., Foster, S.L., Lowery, A.E., Hengeller, S.W., Chapman, J.E. & Rowland, M.D. (2011). Measuring practitioner attitudes toward evidence-based treatments: A validation study. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse 20, 166-183.

Hill, C.E., Satterwhite, D.B., Larrimore, M.L., Mann, A.R., Johnson, V.C., Simon, R.E., Simpson, A.C. & Knox, S. (2012). Attitudes about psychotherapy: A qualitative study of introductory psychology students who never have been in psychotherapy and the influence of attachment style. Counseling and Psychotherapy Research 12, 13-24.

Angermeyer, M.C., Breier, P., Dietrich, S., Kenzine, D. & Matschinger, H. (2005). Public attitudes toward psychiatric treatment. An international comparison. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 40, 855-864.

Riedel-Heller, S.G., Matschinger, H. & Angermeyer, M.C. (2005). Mental disorders – who and what might help? Help-seeking and treatment preferences of the lay public. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 40, 167-174.

Melas, C.D., Zampetakis, L.A., Dimopoulos, A. & Moustakis, V. (2012). Evaluating the properties of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) in health care. Psychological Assessment 24, 867-876.

Anderson, N.H. (2008). Unified social cognition. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Guedj, M., Sorum, P.C. & Mullet, E. (2012). French lay people’s views regarding the acceptability of involuntary hospitalization of patients suffering from psychiatric illness. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 35, 50-56.

Muñoz Sastre, M.T., Sorum, P.C. & Mullet, E. (2014). Lay people’s and health professionals’ views about breaking bad news to children. Child: Care, Health & Development 40 (1) 106-114.

Hofmans, J. & Mullet, E. (2013). Towards unveiling individual differences in different stages of information processing: A clustering-based approach. Quality and Quantity 47, 555-564.

Fruchart, E., Rulence-Pâques, P. & Mullet, E. (2007). Ecological validity test of laboratory studies on information integration. Teorie & Modelli (Special Issue on Functional Measurement) 12, 281-288.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v2i3.741

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.