Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Clinical Decision-Making for a Person Centered Medicine: the necessity of casuistic reasoning

Mark Tonelli

Abstract


In their call to develop a consistent, coherent and comprehensive notion of person-centered medicine, Miles and Mezzich have elucidated several specific challenges that need to be urgently addressed. One of these foundational tasks is the development of a more complete understanding of person-centered clinical decision-making. Miles and Mezzich note that while the emphasis on clinical research in evidence-based medicine has served to de-emphasize the importance of the individual patient, the alternative of patient-centered medicine has the potential to de-emphasize the judgment of the clinician by making unfettered patient choice paramount. A practice of medicine that reduces professional healers to an informational role only, one where they lay out potential interventions devoid of context and allow patients to choose from amongst them, undervalues clinical expertise and will clearly not lead to better outcomes. Person-centered medicine (PCM), then, must be able to develop and defend a model of clinical judgment and practice that strikes the correct balance between the science of medicine and the personal experience of the individual in search of care.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Miles, A. & Mezzich, J.E. (2011). The care of the patient and the soul of the clinic: person centered medicine as an emergent model of modern clinical practice. International Journal of Person Centered Medicine 1 (2) 207-222.

Miles, A. & Mezzich, J.E. (2011). Person centered medicine:advancing methods, promoting implementation. International Journal of Person Centered Medicine 1 (3) 423-428.

Brock, D.W. (1991). The ideal of shared decision making between physicians and patients. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1, 28-47.

Tonelli, M.R. (2006). Integrating evidence into clinical practice: an alternative to evidence-based approaches. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12, 248-256.

Tinetti, M.E. & Fried, T. (2004). The end of the disease era. American Journal of Medicine 116, 179-185.

Upshur, R.E. & Colak, E. (2003). Argumentation and evidence. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24, 283-299.

Moumjid, N., Gafni, A., Brémond, A. & Carrère, M.O. (2007). Shared decision making in the medical encounter: are we talking about the same thing? Medical Decision Making 27, 539-546.

Emanuel, E.G. & Emanuel, L.L. (1992). Four models of the physcian-patient relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association 267, 2221-2226.

Charles, C., Gafni, A. & Whelan, T. (1997). Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine 44, 681-692.

Tonelli, M.R. (1998). The philosophical limits of evidence-based medicine. Academic Medicine 73, 234-240.

Jonsen, A.R. & Toulmin, S. (1988). The Abuse of Casuistry. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Mercuri, M. & Gafni, A. (2011). Medical practice variations: what the literature tells us (or does not) about what are warranted and unwarranted practice variations. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17, 671-677.

Persell, S.D., Dolan, N.C., Friesema, E.M., Thompson, J.A., Kaiser, D. & Baker, D.W. (2010). Frequency of inappropriate medical exceptions to quality measures. Annals of Internal Medicine 152, 225-231.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v2i1.706

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.