The Person Is The Organism: Overcoming The Nature-Culture Dichotomy In Person Centred Healthcare
Abstract
Person Centred Healthcare (PCH) arose in the context of gerontology but has now broadened its impact to the wider healthcare domain. While there is much to celebrate in this, there are some serious conceptual flaws in the framework which have only ramified as it continues to grow. Central to these flaws is a dichotomous view of the distinction between persons as the subjects of PCH and the biological organism which is the concern of the traditional bio-medical model. Most worryingly this has led some PCH advocates to flirt with unscientific and potentially dangerous Complementary and Alternative therapies. This article examines this dichotomy and suggests, following Tim Ingold, that ‘the person is the organism’ but that to properly understand this we need a more nuanced view of both persons and organisms which a developmentalist perspective makes possible.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Nolan, M.R., Davies, S., Brown, J., Keady, J. & Nolan, J. (2004). Beyond ‘person‐centred’ care: a new vision for gerontological nursing. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13, 45-53.
di Sarsina, R.P. & Tassinari, M. (2015). Person-centred healthcare and medicine paradigm: it's time to clarify. The EPMA Journal 6 (1) 11.
Loughlin, M. (2011). What Person-Centered Medicine is and isn't: Temptations for the ‘soul’ of PCM European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare 2 (1) 16-21.
Dewing et. al. Philosophical perspectives on person-centeredness for healthcare research. (2017). In: Person-Centred Healthcare Research. McCormack, B., van Dulmen, A.M., Eide, H., Skovdahl, K. & Eide, T. (Eds.). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
MacIntyre, A.C. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues (Vol. 20). Chicago: Open Court Publishing.
Thompson, E.P. (1963). The Making Of The English Working Class. New York: Vintage Books.
Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception Of The Environment: Essays On Livelihood, Dwelling And Skill. London & New York: Routledge.
Robert, J.S. (2004). Evolution, Embryology and Epigenesis: Taking Development Seriously. Cambridge: CUP.
Van Valen, L. (1976). Energy and evolution. Evolutionary Theory 1 (7) 179-229.
Lewontin, R.C. (2001). The triple helix: Gene, organism, and environment. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Bobadilla, J.L., Macek, M., Fine, J.P. & Farrell, P.M. (2002). Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR mutations - correlation with incidence data and application to screening. Human Mutation 19 (6) 575-606.
Mayr, E. (2007). What makes biology unique? Considerations on the autonomy of a scientific discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kroeber, A.L. (1917). The Superorganic. American Anthropologist 19 (2) 163-213.
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (undated). Evolutionary Psychology: A Primer. Available at: http://cogweb.ucla.edu/ep/EP-primer.html. (Last accessed 20/12/15).
Hamilton, R.P. (2002). How To Get Real About Rape: Evolutionary Psychology, Coercion And Consent, Contemporary Issues In Law 6 (1) 79-91.
Hamilton, R.P. (2008). The Darwinian Cage: Evolutionary Psychology As Moral Science Theory, Culture & Society 25 (2) 105-125.
Buller, D. (2006). Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology And The Persistent Quest For Human Nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dupré, J. (2001). Human Nature And The Limits Of Science. Oxford: OUP.
Rose, H, & Rose, S. (2000). Alas Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology. London: Vintage.
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1992). The Psychological Foundations of Culture Chapter One. In: The Adapted Mind : Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Barkow, J., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (Eds.). New York: OUP.
Zuk, M. (2013). Paleofantasy: What evolution really tells us about sex, diet, and how we live. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Odling-Smee, F.J., Laland, K.N. & Feldman, M.W. (2003). Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution (MPB-37). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mauss, M .(1979). Body techniques from Mauss, Marcel, Sociology and Psychology: Essays pp.97-123. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v8i1.1824
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.