Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Evaluation of a four-week Rehabilitation Assessment program introduced at an Australian Community Care Units setting: mental health consumers and clinicians perspectives

Jodie Nguy, Melissa Petrakis, Michael Wilson

Abstract


 

Background: Community Care Units (CCUs) are purpose built residential accommodation for adults with severe and enduring mental illness. The CCUs are staffed by clinical mental health staff 24 hours per day and there are consistent guidelines as to the process these programs utilise to prioritise who would most benefit from them. A CCU based in the Inner East of Melbourne, Australia, has utilised one bed as a ‘review program’ to assess patients’ functional livings skills and potential for engagement with the long-term rehabilitation program as part of a general more person-centered healthcare approach.

 

Aims: The purpose was to evaluate: (1) patient perception of the program and if this benefits their rehabilitation, (2) the perception of clinicians who refer to the program and (3) the perception of clinicians of the CCU multidisciplinary team (MDT).

 

Method: A purposive sample of patients and clinicians was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 7 patients who had participated in the review program between January 2010 - April 2012 and an online survey was conducted with responses from 5 case managers who had referred patients and 9 clinicians in the CCU MDT team who had participated in conducting the review.

 

Results: Our results indicated that patients found the process somewhat overwhelming and an adjustment to their daily routine; they were generally unclear as to the rationale for referral to the program. Clinicians found the program to be a useful process in assisting a more in-depth understanding of their patients’ needs.

 

Conclusion: Results suggest that review and modification to program delivery could enhance patient benefits and enhance more person-centered approaches to care.

 


Keywords


Community-based care, person-centered healthcare, rehabilitation, residential assessment, severe mental illness, Strengths

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chopra, P. & Herrman, H. (2011). The Long-term Outcomes and Unmet Needs of a Cohort of Former Long-Stay Patients in Melbourne, Australia. Community Mental Health Journal 47 (5) 531-541.

King, C., Singh, K. & Sheperd, G. (2000). An analysis of process and outcome for new long-stay patients in a 'ward-in-a-house'. Journal of Mental Health 9 (2) 179-191.

Trauer, T., Farhall, J., Newton, R. & Cheung, P. (2001). From long-stay psychiatric hospital to Community Care Unit: evaluation at 1 year. Social Psychiatry And Psychiatric Epidemiology 36 (8) 416-419.

Hamden, A., Newton, R., McCauley-Elsom, K. & Cross, W. (2011). Is deinstitutionalization working in our community? International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 20 (4) 274-283.

Department of Human Services. (2007). Community Care (CCU) and secure extended care units (SECU). Program management circular. Victoria: Mental Health Branch Metropolitan Health and Aged Care Services Division. pp. 1-4.

Munro, J., Palmada, M., Russell, A., Taylor, P., Heir, B., McKay, J. & Lloyd, C. (2007). Queensland extended care services for people with severe mental illness and the role of occupational therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. 54 (4) 257-265.

Rapp, C.A. & Goscha, R.J. (2006). The strengths model: case management with people with psychiatric disabilities, 2nd edn. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Government of Australia. (2010). National Standards for Mental Health Services.

Leighton, K. (2005). Practice development. Action research: the revision of services at one mental health rehabilitation unit in the north of England. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing 12 (3) 372-379.

Victorian Department of Health. (2011). Framework for recovery-oriented practice.

Armstrong, J.S. (1982). The Value of Formal Planning for strategic Decisions: Review of Empirical Research. Strategic Management Journal 3 (3) 197-211.

Armstrong M. (2001). A Handbook of Management Techniques: The Best Selling Guide to Modern Management Methods, 3rd edn. London: Kogan Page.

Vandevooren, J., Miller, L. & O'Reilly, R. (2007). Outcomes in community-based residential treatment and rehabilitation for individuals with psychiatric disabilities: a retrospective study. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 30 (3) 215-217.

Hawthorne, W.B., Fals-Stewart, W. & Lohr, J.B. (1994). A treatment outcome study of community-based residential care. Hospital & Community Psychiatry 45 (2) 152-155.

Teesson, M., Hodder, T. & Buhrich, N. (2004). Psychiatric disorders in homeless men and women in inner Sydney. The Australian And New Zealand Journal Of Psychiatry 38 (3) 162-168.

Butcher, J.N., Graham, J.R., Ben-Porath, Y.S., Tellegen, A., Dhahlstrom, G. & Kaemmer, B. (2001). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Lichtenberger, E.O. & Kaufman, A.S. (2013). Essentials of WAIS-IV assessment, 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Fisher, A.G. (2006). Assessment of Motor and Process Skills: Volume 1 - Development, Standardisation and Administration Manual, 7th edn. Fort Collins, Colorado: Three Star Press Inc.

Bouteloup, Z. & Beltran, R. (2007). Application of the occupational adaptation framework in child and adolescent occupational therapy practice. A case study. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 54 (3) 228-238.

Fossey, E., Epstein, M., Findlay, R., Plant, G. & Harvey, C. (2002). Creating a positive experience of research for people with psychiatric disabilities by sharing feedback. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 25 (4) 369-378.

Santone, G., de Girolamo, G., Falloon, I., Fioritti, A., Micciolo, R., Picardi, A., Zanalda, E. & PROGRESS Group. (2005). The process of care in residential facilities - a national survey in Italy. Social Psychiatry And Psychiatric Epidemiology 40 (7) 540-550.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v2i3.743

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.