Person-centred clinical reasoning and evidence-based healthcare
Abstract
Purpose: Clinical practice, and in particular decision-making, are dependent on data and knowledge which are relevant to the context at hand. Numerous frameworks have existed which aim to facilitate best clinical decision-making for healthcare professionals and their patients, for example clinical reasoning and the evidence-based healthcare models. The purpose of this paper is to provide some reconciliation between apparently conflicting models of healthcare practice with regards to best practice.
Methods: We provide a theoretical narrative account of clinical practice with regards to clinical reasoning and best decision-making. We problematise the practice frameworks of clinical reasoning and evidence base healthcare by suggesting they are conflicting and contradictory to each other. We frame the arguments available with philosophical views of causation, making the assumption that causation lies central to all aspects of knowledge. We use the narrative to expose causal theories behind different practice models and illustrate our account with a case study.
Results: Clinical reasoning and evidence-based healthcare are characterised by different causal theories which do not readily align with each other. By reconceptualising causation as a dispositional phenomenon, reconciliation between individualised person-centred care and the population data which are the core interest of evidence-based healthcare, can be found, thus preserving the most valuable aspects of each practice framework.
Conclusion: Reconceptualising causation in dispositionalist terms facilitates a more person-centred, multi-dimensional clinical reasoning process. This in-turn allows for the integration of data from prioritised methods of evidence-based healthcare into complex and context-sensitive individualised clinical situations.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Hume, D. (1740; 2000). An Abstract of a Treatise of Human Nature. Norton, D.F. & Norton, M.J. (Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hume, D. (1748) An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jones, M.A. (2019). Clinical Reasoning: Fast and Slow Thinking in Musculoskeletal Practice. In: Clinical Reasoning in Musculoskeletal Practice. 2nd edn. Jones, M.A. & Rivett, D.A. (Eds.). Sydney: Elsevier.
Huhn, K., Gilliland, S.J., Black, L.L., Wainwright, S.F. & Christensen, N. (2019). Clinical Reasoning in Physical Therapy: A Concept Analysis. Physical Therapy 99 (4) 440-456.
Daly, P. (2018). A concise guide to clinical reasoning. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 24 (5) 966-972.
NICE. (2013). Physical activity: brief advice for adults in primary care: Public health guideline [PH44].
Miles, A. & Mezzich, J.E. (2012). The care of the patient and the soul of the clinic: person-centered medicine as an emergent model of modern clinical practice. International Journal of Person Centred Medicine 1 (2) 207-222.
Loughlin, M., Bluhm, R., Buetow, S., Borgerson, K. & Fuller, J. (2017). Reasoning, evidence, and clinical decision-making: The great debate moves forward. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 23 (5) 905-914.
Sizer, P.S., Mauri, M.V., Learman, K., Jones, C., Gill, N., Showalter, C.R. & Brismee, J.M. (2016). Should evidence or sound clinical reasoning dictate patient care? Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 24 (3) 117-119.
Mitchell, T., Beales, D., Slater, H. & O’Sullivan, P. (2017). Multi-dimensional clinical reasoning framework. In: Musculoskeletal Clinical Translation Framework: From Knowing to Doing. Mitchell, T., Beales, D., Slater, H. & O’Sullivan. P. (Eds.). Perth, WA: Curtin University Press.
Guyatt, G. & Rennie, D. (2002). Essentials of evidence-based clinical practice. In: User’s Guide to the Medical Literature. Guyatt, G. & Rennie, D. (Eds.). Chicago: American Medical Association Press.
Guyatt, G.H., Oxman, A.D., Sultan, S., Glasziou, P., Akl, E.A., Alonso-Coello, P., Atkins, D., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Montori, V. et al. (2011). GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64 (12)1311-1316.
La Caze, A. (2008). Evidence‐Based Medicine Can’t Be … Social Epistemology 22 (4) 353-370.
Worrall, J. (2010). Do We Need Some Large, Simple Randomized Trials in Medicine? In: Epsa Philosophical Issues in the Sciences: Launch of the European Philosophy of Science Association, Vol 2. Suarez, M., Dorato, M. & Redei, M. (Eds.), pp. 289-302. London: Springer.
Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. (1973). Causation. The Journal of Philosophy 70 (17) 556-567.
Cartwright, N. (2007). Are RCTs the gold standard? Biosocieties 2 (1) 11-20.
Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. (1992) Evidence-Based Medicine - A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 268 (17) 2420-2425.
Howick, J. (2011). The Philosophy of Evidence-Based Medicine. Chichester: BMJ Books.
Vandenbroucke, J.P. (2008). Observational Research, Randomised Trials, and Two Views of Medical Science. PLoS Medicine 5 (3) e67.
Lewis, D. (1986). Philosophical papers: Volume II. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jacobs, J.D. (2011). Powerful qualities, not pure powers. The Monist 94 (1) 81-102.
Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M.C., Gray, J.A.M., Haynes, R.B. & Richardson, W.S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't - It's about integrating individual clinical expertise and the best external evidence. British Medical Journal 312 (7023) 71-72.
NICE. (2017). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management (NICE guideline NG59).
Mumford, S.D. & Anjum, R.L. (2011). Getting Causes from Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mumford, S.D. (2009). Causal powers and capacities. In: The Oxford Handbook of Causation. Beebee, H., Hitchcock, C. & Menzies, P. (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hume, D. (1739; 2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Norton, D.F. & Norton, M.J. (Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Fara, M. (2005). Dispositions and habituals. Nous 39,43-82.
Low, M. (2017). A novel clinical framework: The use of dispositions in clinical practice. A person centred approach. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 23 (5) 1062-1070.
Samuel, A.M., Moore, H.G. & Cunningham, M.E. (2017). Treatment for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Current Concepts and New Evidence. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 10 (4) 521-529.
Evans, N. & McCarthy, M. (2018). Management of symptomatic degenerative low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis. EFORT Open Reviews 3 (12) 620-631.
Anjum, R.L. & Mumford, S.D. (2018). What Tends To Be: The Philosophy of Dispositional Modality. 1st edn. Abingdon: Routledge.
Rabey, M., Smith, A., Kent, P., Beales, D., Slater, H. & O’Sullivan, P. (2019). Chronic low back pain is highly individualised: patterns of classification across three unidimensional subgrouping analyses. Scandinavian Journal of Pain 19 (4) 743-753.
O’Sullivan, P.B., Caneiro, J.P., O’Keeffe, M., Smith, A., Dankaerts, W., Fersum, K. & O’Sullivan. K. (2018). Cognitive Functional Therapy: An Integrated Behavioral Approach for the Targeted Management of Disabling Low Back Pain. Physical Therapy 98 (5)408-423.
Walton, D.M. & Elliott, J.M. (2018). A new clinical model for facilitating the development of pattern recognition skills in clinical pain assessment. Musculoskeletal Science & Practice 36, 17-24.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v8i2.1845
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.