Open Access
Subscription Access
The impact of patient complaints and compliments on medical performance: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Patient complaints and compliments are considered integral to patient safety and quality of care. This review therefore sought to explore the impact of patient complaints and compliments on the medical performance of individual doctors.
Method: Database searches were performed in PubMed, PsycInfo, EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library for peer-reviewed publications published in the English language between 2007-2017. Data were thematically analysed and synthesised using a modified narrative approach. Impact was assessed using Barr’s (2000) adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model.
Results: Of the 355 articles retrieved, 6 were included. One identified a change in measured performance (Kirkpatrick level 3b). Five identified a self-reported change (Kirkpatrick level 3a) in performance or behaviour. No articles identified a change in the health and wellbeing of patients (Kirkpatrick level 4). Improved patient relations, more thorough documentation, enhanced referral, prescription and testing requests were identified as positive impacts, although such changes may also be detrimental. Other detrimental impacts identified included a break down in patient relations, increased defensive practise, early retirement and altered physical or mental wellbeing. Personal, procedural and cultural factors appeared influential. No articles examining the impact of compliments were identified.
Conclusion: Patient complaints can have an impact on medical performance. These can be both positive and negative. The intended purpose of complaints may be undermined by personal, procedural and cultural factors. The fear, language and stigmatisation of complaints should be addressed and the recognition of compliments more actively encouraged. Review findings have implications for those involved in designing and supporting complaint and compliment processes within the broader framework of person-centered care approaches in health systems.Keywords
References
Bismark, M.M., Brennan, T.A., Paterson, R.J., Davis, P.B. & Studdert, D.M. (2006). Relationship between complaints and quality of care in New Zealand: a descriptive analysis of complainants and non‐complainants following adverse events. Quality & Safety in Health Care 15 (1) 17-22.
Reader, T.W., Gillespie, A. & Roberts, J. (2014). Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy. BMJ Quality & Safety 23 (8) 678-689.
Barragry, R.A., Varadkar, L.E., Hanlon, D.K., Bailey, K.F., O'Dowd, T.C. & O'Shea, B.J. (2016). An analytic observational study on complaints management in the general practice out of hours care setting: who complains, why, and what can we do about it? BMC Family Practice 17, 1-7.
Pichert, J.W., Hickson, G. & Moore, I. (2008). Using patient complaints to promote patient safety. In: Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches. Henriksen, K., Battles, J.B., Keyes, M.A. & Grady, M.L. (Eds.). Vol.2. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Forde, R. & Aasland, O.G. (2017). Is imperfection becoming easier to live with for doctors? Clinical Ethics 12 (1) 31-36.
Nash, L., Tennant, C. & Walton, M. (2004). The Psychological Impact of Complaints and Negligence Suits on Doctors. Australasian Psychiatry 12 (3) 278-281.
General Medical Council. (2015). Understanding the rise in Fitness to Practise complaints from members of the public 2014 Available at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/about/research/25233.asp.
Nash, L.M., Walton, M.M., Daly, M.G., Kelly, P.J., Walter, G., van Ekert, E.H., Willcock, S.M. & Tennant, C.C. (2010). Perceived practice change in Australian doctors as a result of medicolegal concerns. Medical Journal of Australia 193 (10) 579-583.
Tritter, J.Q. & Koivusalo, M. (2013). Undermining patient and public engagement and limiting its impact: The consequences of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 on collective patient and public involvement. Health Expectations 16 (2) 115-118.
Clwyd, A. & Hart, T. (2013). A review of the NHS hospitals complaints system: putting patients back in the picture. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/255615/NHS_complaints_accessible.pdf.
Doig, G. (2004). Responding to formal complaints about the emergency department: lessons from the service marketing literature. Emergency Medicine Australasia 16 (4) 353-360.
Cunningham, W. (2004). New Zealand doctors' attitudes towards the complaints and disciplinary process. New Zealand Medical Journal 117 (1198) U973.
Healy, J. & Braithwaite, J. (2006). Designing safer health care through responsive regulation. Medical Journal of Australia 184 (Supplement 10) S56-S59.
General Medical Council. (2012). The General Medical Council (Licence to Practise and Revalidation) Regulations Order of Council 2012. Available at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/LtP_and_Reval_Regs_2012.pdf_50435434.pdf.
General Medical Council. (2012). Guidance on colleague and patient questionnaires. Available at: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/Guidance_on_colleague_and_patient_questionnaire.pdf_72399762.pdf.
Nash, L., Curtis, B., Walton, M., Willcock, S. & Tennant, C. (2006). The response of doctors to a formal complaint. Australasian Psychiatry 14 (3) 246-250.
Nash, L., Daly, M., Johnson, M., Walter, G., Walton, M., Willcock, S., Coulston, C., van Ekert, E. & Tennant, C. (2007). Psychological morbidity in Australian doctors who have and have not experienced a medico-legal matter: cross-sectional survey. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 41 (11) 917-925.
Bourne, T., Wynants, L., Peters, M., Van Audenhove, C., Timmerman, D., Van Calster, B. & Jalmbrant, M. (2015). The impact of complaints procedures on the welfare, health and clinical practise of 7926 doctors in the UK: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 5 (1) e006687.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. & Altman, D.G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 151 (4) 264-269.
Khan, K.S., Ter Riet, G., Glanville, J., Sowden, A.J. & Kleijnen, J. (2001). Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD's guidance for carrying out or commissioning reviews: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. York: National Institute for Health Research.
Sampson, M., McGowan, J., Cogo, E., Grimshaw, J., Moher, D. & Lefebvre, C. (2009). An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62 (9) 944-952.
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z. & Elmagarmid A. (2016). Rayyan - a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Available at: https://rayyan.qcri.org/.
Fereday, J. & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1) 80-92.
Thomas, J. & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology 8 (1) 1-10.
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M. et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme Version. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.178.3100&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Barr, H., Freeth, D., Hammick, M. & Koppel, I.S.R. (2000). Evaluations of Interprofessional Education: A United Kingdom Review of Health and Social Care. London: CAPE.
National Institutes of Health. (2014). Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies 2014. Available at: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardiovascular-risk-reduction/tools/cohort.
Higgins, J.P. & Green, S. (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Wiley Online Library.
Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D.R., Miller, T., Sutton, A.J., Shaw, R.L., Smith, J.A. & Young, B. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research 6 (1) 27-44.
Levin, C.M. & Hopkins, J. (2014). Creating a Patient Complaint Capture and Resolution Process to Incorporate Best Practices for Patient-Centered Representation. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 40 (11) 484-412.
Nash, L., Walton, M., Daly, M., Johnson, M., Walter, G., van Ekert, E., Willcock, S. & Tennant, C. (2009). GPs’ concerns about medicolegal issues How it affects their practice. Australian Family Physician 38 (1-2) 66-70.
Nash, L., Walton, M., Daly, M., Johnson, M., Walter, G., van Ekert, E., Willcock, S. & Tennant, C. (2009). GPs' concerns about medicolegal issues - How it affects their practice. Australian Family Physician 38 (1-2) 66-70.
Baines, R., de Bere, S.R., Stevens, S., Read, J., Marshall, M., Lalani, M., Bryce, M. & Archer, J. (2018). The impact of patient feedback on the medical performance of qualified doctors: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education 18 (1) 173.
Price, T.J., Baines, R., Marshall, M., Cameron, N., Bryce, M. & Archer. (2019). Learning from significant medical events: a systematic review. European Journal for Person Centred Healthcare 7 (2) 228-237.
Baines, R., Donovan, J., Regan de Bere, S., Archer, J. & Jones, R. (2019). Patient and public involvement in the design, administration and evaluation of patient feedback tools, an example in psychiatry: a systematic review and critical interpretative synthesis. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 24 (2) 130-142 .
Archer, J., Regan de Bere, S., Bryce, M., Nunn, S., Lynn, N., Coombes, L. & Roberts, M. (2014). Understanding the rise in Fitness to Practise complaints from members of the public. Available at: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/about/understanding-the-rise-in-fitness-to-practise-complaints-from-members-of-the-public.pdf?la=en&hash=C180B8C329E277024F42B5CF978ECC51AB444651.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v7i3.1756
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.