Understanding the factors that influence clinical decision-making - a sequential explanatory mixed methods study protocol
Abstract
Background: Despite soaring healthcare costs, patient outcomes are suboptimal in the USA. Efforts to limit healthcare costs and improve quality of care have had limited success. An improved understanding of factors that influence clinical decision-making may provide insight into optimizing the quality and costs of care. The process of healthcare decision-making is contextual, complex and poorly understood. This study aims to explore the factors that influence clinical decision-making in the setting of limited evidence of effectiveness, limited or conflicting guidance, significant resource burden and variation in values and preferences.
Rationale for study design: This sequential explanatory mixed methods study includes a case-based survey (quantitative phase). The results of the survey will guide the sampling and questions for the semi-structured interviews (qualitative phase). The interviews will provide an in-depth explanation of the survey results. Combining the two methods provides complementary information and deeper understanding of the phenomenon of clinical decision-making.
Methods: The quantitative strand will consist of case-based surveys in the fields of neonatology and cardiology. Participants are asked to pick the best management choice for each question followed by a rating of the influence of different factors on a 7-point Likert scale. Follow-up questions explore knowledge and influence of evidence, guideline recommendations and costs on decision-making. Analysis of the survey results will inform sampling and the focus of qualitative interviews. The interviews will be analyzed using qualitative description.
Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first study using a mixed methods approach including a case-based survey of physicians practicing in diverse settings to explore the factors that influence clinical decision-making. The results of this study may assist with strategies to implement high value care resulting in improved patient outcomes and limiting costs.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Martin, A.B., Hartman, M., Benson, J. & Catlin, A. (2016). National Health Spending In 2014: Faster Growth Driven By Coverage Expansion And Prescription Drug Spending. Health Affairs (Millwood) 35 (1) 150-160.
Davis, K., Squires, D. & Schoen, C. (2014). Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, 2014 Update: How the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally. Report of the Commonwealth Fund.
Society MM. (2012). MMS Ethics Forum: Cost-Conscious Medicine. Available at: http://blog.massmed.org/index.php/2012/11/ethics-forum-cost-conscious-medicine/.
Neumann, P.J. & Sanders, G.D. (2017). Cost-Effectiveness Analysis 2.0. New England Journal of Medicine 376 (3) 203-205.
Himmelstein, D.U., Thorne, D., Warren, E. & Woolhandler, S. (2009). Medical bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: results of a national study. American Journal of Medicine 122 (8) 741-746.
Rosenbaum, L. & Lamas, D. (2012). Cents and sensitivity - teaching physicians to think about costs. New England Journal of Medicine 367 (2) 99-101.
Battista, R.N., Cote, B., Hodge, M.J. & Husereau, D. (2009). Health technology assessment in Canada. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 25 (Supplement 1) 53-60.
CADTH. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. (2017). Avauilable at: https://www.cadth.ca/about-cadth/how-we-do-it/methods-and-guidelines.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2012). Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations - FDA Orange Book 32nd Edition (2012): FDA Orange Book 32nd Edition (2012). DrugPatientWatch.com.
Dukhovny, D., Pursley, D.M., Kirpalani, H.M., Horbar, J.H. & Zupancic, J.A. (2016). Evidence, Quality, and Waste: Solving the Value Equation in Neonatology. Pediatrics 137 (3) e20150312.
Ho, T., Dukhovny, D., Zupancic, J.A., Goldmann, D.A., Horbar, J.D. & Pursley, D.M. (2015). Choosing Wisely in Newborn Medicine: Five Opportunities to Increase Value. Pediatrics 136 (2) e482-489.
Schnipper, L.E., Davidson, N.E., Wollins, D.S., et al. (2016). Updating the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework: Revisions and Reflections in Response to Comments Received. Journal of Clinical Oncology 34 (24) 2925-2934.
Anderson, J.L., Heidenreich, P.A., Barnett, P.G., Creager, M.A., Fonarow, G.C., Gibbons, R.J., Halperin, J.L., Hlatky, M.A., Jacobs, A.K., Mark, D.B., Masoudi, F.A., Peterson, E.D. & Shaw, L.J. (2014). ACC/AHA statement on cost/value methodology in clinical practice guidelines and performance measures: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 63 (21) 2304-2322.
Shen, W.K., Sheldon, R.S., Benditt, D.G., et al. (2017). 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Journal of the American College of Cardiolology 14 (8) e155-e217.
Schwartz, J.A. & Pearson, S.D. (2013). Cost consideration in the clinical guidance documents of physician specialty societies in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine 173 (12) 1091-1097.
Jacobs, A.K., Anderson, J.L. & Halperin, J.L. (2014). The Evolution and Future of ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines: A 30-Year Journey. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 64 (13) 1373-1384.
Anderson, J.L., Heidenreich, P.A., Barnett, P.G., Creager, M.A., Fonarow, G.C., Gibbons, R.J., Halperin, J.L., Hlatky, M.A., Jacobs, A.K., Mark, D.B., Masoudi, F.A., Peterson, E.D. & Shaw, L.J., ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures & ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. (2014). ACC/AHA Statement on Cost/Value Methodology in Clinical Practice Guidelines and Performance Measures. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Cardiology 129 (22) 2329-2345.
Ginsburg, M.E., Kravitz, R.L. & Sandberg, W.A. (2000). A survey of physician attitudes and practices concerning cost-effectiveness in patient care. Western Journal of Medicine 173 (6) 390-394.
Altomare, I., Irwin, B., Zafar, S.Y., Houck, K., Maloney, B., Greenup, R. & Peppercorn, J. (2016). Physician Experience and Attitudes Toward Addressing the Cost of Cancer Care. Journal of Oncology Practice 12 (3) 247-248.
Sanders, G.D., Neumann, P.J., Basu, A., Brock, D.W., Feeny, D., Krahn, M., Kuntz, K.M., Meltzer, D.O., Owens, D.K., Prosser, L.A., Salomon, J.A., Sculpher, M.J., Trikalinos, T.A., Russell, L.B., Siegel, J.E. & Ganiats, T.G. (2016). Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: Second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 316 (10) 1093-1103.
Mercuri, M., Sherbino, J., Sedran, R.J., Frank, J.R., Gafni, A. & Norman, G. (2015). When guidelines don't guide: the effect of patient context on management decisions based on clinical practice guidelines. Academic Medicine 90 (2) 191-196.
Brandt Vegas, D., Levinson, W., Norman, G., Monteiro, S. & You, J.J. (2015). Readiness of hospital-based internists to embrace and discuss high-value care with patients and family members: a single-centre cross-sectional survey study. CMAJ Open 3 (4) E382-386.
Smith, C.D. (2012). Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine-American College of Physicians High V, Cost-Conscious Care Curriculum Development C. Teaching high-value, cost-conscious care to residents: the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine-American College of Physicians Curriculum. Annals of Internal Medicine 157 (4) 284-286.
Wolfson, D., Santa, J. & Slass, L. (2014). Engaging Physicians and Consumers in Conversations About Treatment Overuse and Waste: A Short History of the Choosing Wisely Campaign. Academic Medicine 89 (7) 990-995.
Willson, A. (2015). The problem with eliminating 'low-value care'. BMJ Quality & Safety 24 (10) 611-614.
Institute ofMedicine & Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
AHRQ. (2017). Agency for Healthcare Researech and Quality. Available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/talkingquality/create/sixdomains.html#_ftn1.
Mancuso, T.J. & Burns, J.P. (2014). Ethical and Medicolegal Considerations. In: Neonatal Anesthesia. Lerman, J. (Ed.), pp. 439-444. New York, NY: Springer New York.
Russell, R.B., Green, N.S., Steiner, C.A., Meilke, S., Howse, J.L., Poschman, K., Dias, T., Potetz, L., Davidoff, M.J., Damus, K. & Petrini, J.R. (2007). Cost of hospitalization for preterm and low birth weight infants in the United States. Pediatrics 120 (1) e1-9.
Institute of Medicine, & Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes. (2007). Outcomes CUPBAH, Policy BHS, Medicine I. Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention. Behrman, R.E. & Butler, A.S. (eds.). Washington DC: National Academies Press.
Wei, D., Osman, C., Dukhovny, D., Romley, J., Hall, M., Chin, S., Ho, T., Friedlich, P.S. & Lakshmanan, A. (2016). Cost consciousness among physicians in the neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Perinatology 36 (11) 1014-1020.
Underwood, M.A., Danielsen, B. & Gilbert, W.M. (2007). Cost, causes and rates of rehospitalization of preterm infants. Journal of Perinatology 27 (10) 614-619.
Gilbert, W.M. (2006). The cost of preterm birth: the low cost versus high value of tocolysis. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 113 (Supplement 3) 4-9.
Gilbert, W.M., Nesbitt, T.S. & Danielsen, B. (2003). The cost of prematurity: quantification by gestational age and birth weight. Obstetrics and Gynecology 102 (3) 488-492.
Benjamin, E.J., Blaha, M.J., Chiuve, S.E., et al. (2017). Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 135 (10) e146-e603.
Heidenreich, P.A., Trogdon, J.G., Khavjou, O.A., et al. Forecasting the Future of Cardiovascular Disease in the United States. A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 123 (8) 933-944.
Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine, The National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. (2015). Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. Balogh, E.P., Miller, B.T. & Ball, J.R. (Eds.). Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Board on Health Care Services & Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care. (2015). Improving diagnosis in healthcare. Balogh, E.P., Miller, B.T. & Ball, J.R. (Eds.). [Youtube video]. 2015; Video - Improving diagnosis in healthcare - Carolyn's story. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fStBWT6fa3E. Accessed January 5th, 2018.
Creswell, J.W. & Clark, V.L.P. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications; 2011.
Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health 23 (4) 334-340.
Colorafi, K.J. & Evans, B. (2016). Qualitative Descriptive Methods in Health Science Research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design 9 (4) 16-25.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/.
IBM. (2016). Available at: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLVMB_24.0.0/spss/product_landing.html.
Nataliya, V.I., John, W.C. & Sheldon, L.S. (2006). Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice. Field Methods 18 (1) 3-20.
http://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-product/nvivo11-for-windows. 2017.
Hsieh, H.F. & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15 (9) 1277-1288.
Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v6i2.1510
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.