Open Access
Subscription Access
Measurement properties of the Illness Perception Questionnaire in practitioners working with patients with co-morbid schizophrenia and learning disability
Abstract
Rationale, aims and objectives: The widely-used Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) adapted for use in patients with major mental health problems and those who care and work with them, was originally developed for evaluating the illness perceptions of patients with physical pathology. There have been concerns expressed regarding the appropriateness of the IPQ and derivative measures of it in axis I disorders such as schizophrenia. The current investigation examined the measurement characteristics of a modified version of the IPQ in mental health practitioners working with patients with schizophrenia co-morbid with learning disability.
Method: Two hundred and ten mental health practitioners working with patients with schizophrenia co-morbid with learning disability participated in the study. Contemporary models of the measurement structure of the IPQ were evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis. The internal reliability of the IPQ was also evaluated.
Results: Single factor, 5-factor and 6-factor models were evaluated against data. All models were found to offer a poor fit to the data. The internal reliability of the measure was also found to be unsatisfactory overall.
Conclusions: Consistent with one previous study that has found poor measurement characteristics of the IPQ when used in the context of schizophrenia, the current study found the measure to be a poorly performing index of illness perceptions. Echoing previous observations of the use of this tool in axis I disorder, it is recommended that a new measure of illness perceptions be developed using contemporary research methodology sensitive to the context of psychotic illness in order to provide a more effective tool for the provision of person-centered psychiatry and healthcare.
Keywords
References
Anagnostopoulos, F. & Spanea, E. (2005). Assessing illness representations of breast cancer: a comparison of patients with healthy and benign controls. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 58 (4) 327-334.
Henderson, M., Safa, F., Easterbrook, P. & Hotopf, M. (2005). Fatigue among HIV-infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. HIV Medicine 6 (5) 347-352.
Petrie, K.J., Cameron, L.D., Ellis, C.J., Buick, D. & Weinman, J. (2002). Changing illness perceptions after myocardial infarction: an early intervention randomized controlled trial. Psychosomatic Medicine 64 (4) 580-586.
Petrie, K.J., Weinman, J., Sharpe, N. & Buckley, J. (1996). Role of patients' view of their illness in predicting return to work and functioning after myocardial infarction: longitudinal study. British Medical Journal 312 (7040) 1191-1194.
Weinman, J., Petrie, K.J., Moss-Morris, R. & Horne, R. (1996). The Illness Perception Questionnaire: a new method for assessing the cognitive representations of illness. Psychology & Health 11 (3) 431-445.
Loignon, C., Bedos, C., Sevigny, R. & Leduc, N. (2009). Understanding the self-care strategies of patients with asthma. Patient Education and Counseling 75 (2) 256-262.
Millar, K., Purushotham, A.D., McLatchie, E., George, W.D. & Murray, G.D. (2005). A 1-year prospective study of individual variation in distress, and illness perceptions, after treatment for breast cancer. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 58 (4) 335-342.
Werner, S. (2012). Intention to work with individuals with dual diagnosis: testing the theory of planned behavior among students from various professions. Health & Social Work 37 (2) 81-89.
Wray, J., Lindsay, B., Crozier, K., Andrews, L. & Leeson, J. (2013). Exploring perceptions of psychological services in a children's hospice in the United Kingdom. Palliative & Supportive Care 11 (5) 373-382.
Chan, J.C., Ong, J.C., Avalos, G., Regan, P.J., McCann, J., Groarke, A. & Kelly, J.L. (2009). Illness representations in patients with hand injury. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 62 (7) 927-932.
French, D.P., Wade, A.N., Yudkin, P., Neil, H.A., Kinmonth, A.L. & Farmer, A.J. (2008). Self-monitoring of blood glucose changed non-insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes patients' beliefs about diabetes and self-monitoring in a randomized trial. Diabetic Medicine 25 (10) 1218-1228.
Lee, B.O., Chien, C.S., Hung, C.C. & Chou, P.L. (2015). Effects of an in-hospital nursing intervention on changing illness perceptions in patients with injury. Journal of Advanced Nursing doi: 10.1111/jan.12716.
Quiles Marcos, Y., Terol Cantero, M.C., Romero Escobar, C. & Pagan Acosta, G. (2007). Illness perception in eating disorders and psychosocial adaptation. European Eating Disorders Review 15 (5) 373-384.
Cook, S.A., Salmon, P., Dunn, G., Holcombe, C., Cornford, P. & Fisher, P. (2015). The association of metacognitive beliefs with emotional distress after diagnosis of cancer. Health Psychology 34 (3) 207-215.
Higbed, L. & Fox, J.R. (2010). Illness perceptions in anorexia nervosa: a qualitative investigation. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 49 (Part 3) 307-325.
Israel, J.I., White, K.S. & Gervino, E.V. (2015). Illness perceptions, negative emotions, and pain in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings 22 (1) 77-89.
Kaptein, A.A., Scharloo, M., Fischer, M.J., Snoei, L., Cameron, L.D., Sont, J.K., Rabe, K.F. & Weinman, J. (2008). Illness perceptions and COPD: an emerging field for COPD patient management. Journal of Asthma 45 (8) 625-629.
Katerndahl, D.A & Parchman, M. (2002). The ability of the stress process model to explain mental health outcomes. Comprehensive Psychiatry 43 (5) 351-360.
Moss-Morris, R., Weinman, J., Petrie, K.J., Horne, R., Cameron, L.D. & Buick, D. (2002). The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychology & Health 17, 1-16.
Leysen, M., Nijs, J., Meeus, M., Paul van Wilgen, C., Struyf, F., Vermandel, A., Kuppens, K. & Roussel, N.A. (2015). Clinimetric properties of illness perception questionnaire revised (IPQ-R) and brief illness perception questionnaire (Brief IPQ) in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review. Manual Therapy 20 (1) 10-17.
Maas, M., Taal, E., van der Linden, S. & Boonen, A. (2009). A review of instruments to assess illness representations in patients with rheumatic diseases. Annals of Rheumatic Diseases 68 (3) 305-309.
Barrowclough, C., Lobban, F., Hatton, C. & Quinn, J. (2001). An investigation of models of illness in carers of schizophrenia patients using the Illness Perception Questionnaire. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 40 (Part 4) 371-385.
Fleming, M.P., Martin, C.R., Miles, J. & Atkinson, J. (2009). The utility of the Illness Perception Questionnaire in the evaluation of mental health practitioners' perspectives on patients with schizophrenia. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (5) 826-831.
Barrett, B., Young, M.S., Teague, G.B., Winarski, J.T., Moore, K.A. & Ochshorn, E. (2010). Recovery orientation of treatment, consumer empowerment, and satisfaction with services: a mediational model. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 34 (2) 153-156.
Romano, D.M., McCay, E., Goering, P., Boydell, K. & Zipursky, R. (2010). Reshaping an enduring sense of self: the process of recovery from a first episode of schizophrenia. Early Intervention in Psychiatry 4 (3) 243-250.
Russinova, Z., Rogers, E.S., Ellison, M.L. & Lyass, A. (2011). Recovery-promoting professional competencies: perspectives of mental health consumers, consumer-providers and providers. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 34 (3) 177-185.
Werner, S. (2012). Subjective well-being, hope, and needs of individuals with serious mental illness. Psychiatry Research 196 (2-3) 214-219.
Green, S.B., Lissitz, R.W. & Mulaik, S.A. (1977). Limitations of coefficient alpha as an index of test unidimensionality Educational and Psychological Measurement 37, 827-838.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zinbarg, R.E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I. & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ωh : their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika 70, 123-133.
Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach's Alpha. Psychometrika 74 (1) 107-120.
Eisinga, R., te Grotenhuis, M. & Pelzer, B. 92013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health 58, 637-642.
Graham, J.M. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educational and Psychological Measures 66, 930-944.
Satorra, A. & Bentler, P.M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika 66, 507-514.
Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107 (2) 238-246.
Bentler, P.M. & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the evaluation of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88, 588-606.
Hu, L.T. & Bentler, P.M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In: Structural Equation Modelling: Concepts, Issues and Applications. Hoyle, R.H., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R. & McDonald, R.P. (1998). Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin 103, 391-410.
Tucker, L.R. & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38, 1-10.
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297-334.
McDonald, R.P. (1978). Generalizability in factorable domains: “Domain validity and generalizability". Educational and Psychological Measures 38, 75-79.
McDonald, R.P. (1999). Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Team, R.C. (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v4i1.1073
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.